clock

Watching time, the only true currency // A journal from John B. Roberts

Month: July 2003

  • Extremes of parenting

    Get home from work, play games with Ben, go for a walk with him to pick up dinner, he goes off to bed with a smile on his face.

    After eating my cheesesteak, I take Paton. 90 minutes later, she’s still crying. Argh.

  • Glow… going after the calendar…

    Glow is an open-source GUI calendar effort. I can’t really tell without looking around more whether it’s going after the Exchange calendaring server stuff, but honestly, that’s the part of Outlook that I appreciate most: scheduling meetings. The email part is nothing special. I dislike the archive format immensely, and the constant connection to the Exchange server to be useful is the most aggravating thing imagineable when you are working remotely, especially via dial-up (which is, of course, excruciating under any circumstances once you’ve become accustomed to broadband). Still, seems like a quixotic project to me.

  • Conference I would have enjoyed…

    Read Cameron’s report on Bill of Rights for Web Services, Panel, with Tim O’Reilly, O’Reilly & Associates, Inc., Jeff Barr, Amazon.com (didn’t know he had left his consulting gig to go to work for Amazon full-time), and Jeffrey McManus, eBay. I’ll have to look around for other news from the OSCON conference.

  • Sometimes, the web is just…

    Convert an image into HTML or ASCII text. Fun stuff. Of course, I don’t have a logo or other iconic images to translate, but I’ll find something.

  • Cleaning up after Word

    Small Initiatives perked my interest in Word HTML Cleaner. I’ll have to try it sometime, since it’s sometimes useful to write in Word, but the HTML is godawful ugly.

  • Do you qualify?

    CNN story “Geniuses, criminals do best work in their 30s” forces me to ask… does this count double for criminal geniuses?

    Sorry, had to go there. 😉

  • When does it pay to…

    Unlike Tim Bray, I’m not surprised that default placement in (some) news aggregators is for sale. I was amused to see that Adam Curry blew $10,000 about 18 months ago for default placement in Userland’s aggregators. It’s the land grab mentality, and it’s been around forever. In some businesses, it even works. I don’t believe that the RSS/content syndication game is one of those businesses.

    Read Tim O’Reilly’s comments in this Infoworld interview. [found via Emergic.com]

    …But there’s not much difference between Barnesandnoble.comæand Amazon.com in the software they have. What are different are the customers they have, and the amount of customer contribution to their data. With eBay it’s even clearer. The fact is, it’s the critical mass of marketplace buyers and sellers and all the information that people have put in that marketplace as a repository. So I think we’re going to find more and more places where that happens, where somebody gets a critical mass of customers and data and that becomes their source of value.

    The one with the most customers, and the customer data, wins. While demographic data is important (explicit information), the real winning formula is usage data, which cannot be replicated or copied. Of course, just collecting the data isn’t enough. All websites gather data (like barnacles, even). Some businesses use their website intelligently and incorporate feedback loops, both directed and undirected, which build upon the usage data to change the nature of the application. It’s not about the software, but the combination of functionality + data. O’Reilly calls out Amazon and eBay as platforms, a ringing endorsement of their competitive advantage coming from a technical publisher, who deeply understands the power of a platform in the software world.

    So… will ‘Sooners’ be rewarded in the RSS world? Naaahhhh… too easy to get turned on to smart, intelligent voices through the general spreading of information on the web. And how many sites can recoup any payments? (How did Curry make his money back? Ads on his site? I don’t read him regularly.)

    You stuck with me this long… if you don’t recognize the term ‘Sooner,’ read on:

    WHAT IS A “SOONER?”
    The following text was taken from “Talkin’ Dust Bowl Blues,” A Study of Oklahoma’s Cultural Identity During the Great Depression, by W. Richard Fossey: “Originally the word “Sooner” meant a person who had illegally crossed the border of Oklahoma’s Unassigned Lands before they were officially opened for white settlement on April 22, 1889. The Sooners who arrived early had the best choice of land and only had to lie low until they could safely emerge and file a claim. They were naturally disliked by the immigrants who entered Oklahoma legally, and in the early days to call someone a Sooner was to attack his character.” (quoted from the State of Oklahoma website)

  • Trading on the virtual market

    Yes, I’m trying the BlogShares thing. No pain… and probably no gain (in audience/attention). Very smart viral marketing plan of theirs… strong incentive for the blog to include the graphic on its home page. Sure, I buried it like everyone else, but it’s there. Maybe this market will measure time as a currency, eventually. Right now, it’s more of a popularity engine. Technorati still seems more compelling, although I admit to just scratching the surface on both.

  • Why be defensive?

    Over at Daring Fireball, John Gruber has a long column explaining why he’s adding advertisements to his site. He makes several interesting points along the way (jabbing at Business Week specifically, and the “corporate” media in general), and I enjoyed reading most of the essay, but I was surprised by his mild defensiveness about his decision to include advertisements. It was only mild defensiveness, but he didn’t need to apologize for anything. There is nothing wrong with trying to make money from a blog. It may or may not work, and if you don’t make money, that doesn’t make your effort a failure — but everyone is welcome to try whatever they like. Your audience will reward or punish your efforts either way, with their time or their absence. And that’s the part that Gruber pinpoints so well.

    … The lone natural resource in the media landscape is attention. Your attention is what all media are fighting for, and the laws of physics place finite limits upon it. … So effectively, Google’s AdSense is an exchange system for converting your attention into money. … Don’t sell yourself short — your attention is valuable, and advertisers are willing to pay handsomely for it. [Three discontiguous sentences from a long essay: forgive me.]

    Given my bent — remember this site’s tagline re: time? — my readers will understand that I think these opinions are nothing short of brilliant, if not novel.

    One other part of his essay worth noting was his stated interest in quality of audience over quantity. Quote: “My goal for Daring Fireball is not to attract the largest possible audience. Rather, I’m trying to attract the smartest possible audience.” It looks better on his site, with curly quotes and all, but you get the idea. Scoble wrote something similar in April: “Personally, this whole world worries too much about quantity, and not enough about quality. Give me a small audience, please! Even if it ends up being just my mom.”

  • Back to work

    Long night leading up to first day back at work. Manageable day, but oh boy I need some sleep.

    Random other thoughts: (1) I finally want to take the plunge for digital cable. Tour de France coverage is the reason, on OLN. (2) What’s going on with Userland? John Robb leaving, Dave Winer hinting at things. Time will tell. (3) Good night.